Procurement principles are still important even under time pressure
Matt
Hancock and Boris Johnson deploy one single argument, namely that they were in
a hurry, to rebut all criticism.
Public
obligations should not in fact be so
easily dismissed.
I have
undertaken procurement during a pandemic (Ebola, Sierra Leone, with UK
Government money). Much earlier, I have obtained a waiver for part of a public
sector procurement process.
And so
I am aware that even in an emergency, even in a pandemic, the obligations for
appropriate procurement never disappear,
The
requirements to ensure Fitness for
Purpose, Competence of Supplier, Value for Money and transparency still apply –
why would they not do so? The supplier chosen must be competent and appropriate,
and not vastly inferior to the expectations from the open market.
Any
waiver of aspects of the standard process does not remove these requirements,
but should be obtained on the basis that the Senior Responsible Officer
personally commits to ensuring that the requirements will still be met even if
an accelerated process is followed.
This is
perfectly well understood by the Civil Service who can advise Ministers. And so
we have the usual question: are the politicians ignorant of their obligations,
or are they now wilfully attempting to deceive the public with spurious
excuses? In either case it is dangerous
for the public if these people are in
office. This is illustrated by – for example – those heroic NHS staff who have
died because of the problems that Matt Hancock is now unaware of – and
therefore, if we believe him, was always unaware of.
What
could possibly make the case better for a judge-led Public Inquiry now, so that
the lessons that Government Ministers refuse to consider are learned,
understood and applied? That would show bereaved relatives the respect which is
currently lacking from the Health Secretary and Prime Minister.
Comments
Post a Comment