OPEN LETTER TO IAIN STEWART MP CONCERNING THE UNSUITABILITY FOR PUBLIC OFFICE OF BORIS JOHNSON

 

Dear Iain

 I was glad to shake your hand at the Remembrance Day service on Church Green Road.

 I put finger to keyboard now with some weariness after the events of Wednesday.....

The primary event I would highlight from Wednesday is the judgement from the High Court, which did not surprise me, that the VIP Contracting lane was illegal. I have plenty of experience in fair procurement and this was not fair procurement. I referred to this in my previous letter which you dismissed, but the High Court has now confirmed the illegality of this. How dreadful that when the health of the public should be the first priority, friendships are given a higher priority.

 I in fact consider this a more grievous breach of trust that the various Downing Street parties. However, I do also consider it disgraceful that the Prime Minister should :

  • Attend an event which was very clearly a party when the rules forbade that, breaking the criminal law as he did so
  • Earlier, lie to Parliament at the despatch box, declaring himself to be furious at “discovering” then that Downing Street Parties had happened
  • Commission Simon Case and later Sue Gray to investigate Downing Street Parties without providing information about the 20th May party that he attended,

All these are resigning matters.

 I understand that the Prime Minister is sorry that  he has been found out.

 I appreciate that some MPs are waiting the result of the Sue Gray inquiry. This will presumably be delayed by each new party that is being revealed. I can understand that approach, but in fact there are broadly two outcomes possible:

  • The Prime Minister is found to have broken the law
  • The Prime Minister is exonerated on a technicality, thus setting a precedent of “One Rule for Us, One Rule for Them”.

Neither of these would be a reason for confidence in the Prime Minister.

 He has lost the confidence of many Tory rebels who appear to be opposed to any further necessary measures to protect us from the pandemic, creating what a speaker from Independent Sage has described as a vacuum at the heart of Government.

 Please do not inflict on us until the local elections a Prime Minister kept in office in order to take the blame for poor local election results.

 I may not agree with the policies of your political party, but I believe that it is right for democracy that we should have political parties with different policies but all adhering to standards of honesty and integrity. The Conservative Party is more important, I would expect, to you, than preserving in office a man who is clearly unfit for public office , where every defence of his dishonesty debases the Conservative Party.

 I hope soon to see a new Prime Minister drawn not from the Cabinet but from one of your respected and experienced colleagues who chair House of Common Select Committees. This could be a recovery path for the Conservative party and the country from the current low point. I hope that in time you will help to make this happen.

 Yours

Mike Cashman  

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Johnson departure - why, when, how, who & what next ?

Image
  JOHNSON DEPARTURE - why, when, how, who & what next? (1000 words) I have blogged bits of this in various places, so this blog post brings them together. WHY? Boris Johnson is arguably the worst leader we could have at this time. Thousands of people have died unnecessarily because of his mistakes; thousands more will die. We also cannot start to fix the Brexit blunders while the Blunderer-in-Chief is in charge. He persistently resists scrutiny and will learn nothing. #IDontBegPardon , we hear from him, which is why that's the title for our new book & CD. A change of Prime Minister, has the potential to save thousands of lives, and that on its own is a good reason to hope for this and to work towards it. We could get a new Prime Minister who is focused on the real job, not on enriching incompetent cronies in the way that the National Audit Office report shows that Johnson's Government has done. WHY WILL MPs SACK HIM? Most MPs want (1) to retain their seats - that's...
Read more

Meaty First Caller - "Indian variant" B1617 - transcript of Mike Cashman on BBC Radio 4 Any Answers 15 May 2021

  Anita   Anand ( 00:00 ): Let’s start with the news of the Indian variant, the announcement that we've got to go carefully at five o'clock yesterday, Michael Cashman. You're our first caller on this. What did you make of it all? Mike Cashman   ( 00:11 ): Hallo there Anita, I wish that people who spoke about this on the radio understood the maths. We've had both the prime minister and Niall Ferguson saying it's relatively small numbers - and the Prime Minister actually saying, if we saw exponential growth, then we would have to do something about it. We are seeing exponential growth, now. It's tripling each week is what we've seen, Now the government is wrong to block surge vaccination in Blackburn, Bolton, and so on, because that could have a real impact. And you know, I've heard people say, “Oh well, but the vaccine takes three weeks to take effect”; Anita I'll give you a statistic. If it's tripling every week, then in five weeks, it mult...
Read more

Covid situation in India tragically illustrates the impact of "taking it on the chin"

  The Covid situation is India is a humanitarian tragedy, I hope the UK  can help further. The DEC Coronavirus appeal has been extended to cover India The situation is also, if we needed one, an illustration of what could have been the impact in the UK  of “letting the virus move through the population” , “taking it on the chin”,  and of not locking down while other countries do so, to avoid (in the words of Johnson’s Greenwich speech), going “beyond what is medically rational to the point of doing real and unnecessary economic damage”. There is debate as to whether Johnson shouted “let the bodies pile high in their thousands”  and thereby demonstrated a lack of empathy with the bereaved and a lack of caring as to how many would die. But after three fatal decisions to delay lockdowns, and after his refusal to meet families of the bereaved, there can be little doubt about the lack of empathy, or of his continued  inclination towards an approach that woul...
Read more