Five indications that Dominic Cummings returned to Durham the week after Easter - the evidence is worth examining
The evidence that Dominic Cummings returned to Durham the week after Easter includes the following:
Firstly, he was seen by several independent witnesses
walking in the woods that weekend.
Secondly, his “evidence” of being in London is demonstrably
insufficiently robust to withstand scrutiny by anyone except a gullible Prime
Minister; (it may, for example, simply be evidence that one of his mobile
phones was in London that weekend ).
Thirdly, the entire Barnard Castle eye-drive test charade
makes no sense if his wife was available to drive South on Easter Monday.
Fourthly, he sought to convince us that he drove North feeling that his London
home was unsafe for his wife and child to be alone there; why then would he
bring them back to that unsafe environment? But if he had had a week there to
observe that the “unsafe” claim was nonsense, of course he might drive
back to Durham to collect them.
Fifthly, his wife Mary Wakefield wrote in the Spectator that
she emerged from Lockdown into London. This implies that she had a further time
of lockdown after Barnard Castle.
I can certainly imagine that the extra trip may have started
as a careful subterfuge with a phone left with an aide, and possibly driving a
hired or borrowed car.
Neither Cummings nor Johnson ever explained why his wife did
not drive the car on Easter Monday. It may harm your defence if you fail to
mention something that you later rely on.
This makes at the very least an overwhelming case to answer,
and yet Cummings and Johnson have treated the public and the regulations
with contempt. If the Rose Garden was a further charade then both should resign
for misleading the public on a matter of public health regulations.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n8W25vgR8EE
Comments
Post a Comment