RE: The need to consider seriously how to implement the proposed Northern Ireland protocol (summarised 9 questions)
Sent: 01 June 2020 12:16
To: 'iain.stewart.mp@parliament.uk' <iain.stewart.mp@parliament.uk>
Cc: 'mike.cashman@viewdelta.com' <mike.cashman@viewdelta.com>; 'michael.gove.mp@parliament.uk' <michael.gove.mp@parliament.uk>
Subject: RE: The need to consider seriously how to implement the proposed Northern Ireland protocol
Dear Iain
I am sure you have forwarded my
lengthy email on the Northern Ireland protocol, as you did with my first
email to you on the subject, and that you are awaiting a response. You
may find it helpful to send this new email too to Michael Gove or whoever has
Cabinet responsibility, since inclusion by “cc” may be ineffective.
I am not raising any new questions
here, but I thought it might be helpful to have a summarised and
almost stand-alone version. Meanwhile my fuller letters are below
and also available at . https://viewdelta.blogspot.com/2020/05/re-need-to-consider-seriously-how-to.html
You may recall that I have
experience of managing the process of exchanging data via various systems
with 2000 customers of all sizes. While the NI protocol may be more
complex and is certainly more time-pressured I think this gives me some
insight.
The nine questions I wish to ask about the implementation of the Northern Ireland protocol are these:
The nine questions I wish to ask about the implementation of the Northern Ireland protocol are these:
Q1, Has there been any progress on defining the
required processes?
Q2 Has there been any progress on creating
mechanisms to deliver the required processes?
Q3. Has there been any progress on defining consultation
with businesses on the required processes?
Q4. Has a process of open business consultation started?
Q5. If as it appears from public documents that UK
mainland business s exporting to Northern Ireland are not included in the
intended consultation, can plans be changed to include them?
Q6., If there is a plan laying out timescales for
preparation, consultation, publication, implementation by all parties, testing
etc.; please provide details
Q7. In the light for example of Q6, what would be a
realistic timetable overall for Brexit Withdrawal .
Q8 / Q9, Please can you assure me that you have read
this letter and will support an extension to the Transition Period?
If you do not support this, that would imply that you believed that the end of Transition in 2020 is possible, which would imply that you can provide a plan of all necessary activities to the end of 2020, and in that case I would like to see this plan; without this, any belief is just wishful thinking. )
If you do not support this, that would imply that you believed that the end of Transition in 2020 is possible, which would imply that you can provide a plan of all necessary activities to the end of 2020, and in that case I would like to see this plan; without this, any belief is just wishful thinking. )
You may know my views on the
matter, but the above represents an enquiry as to what any feasible plan
concluding in 2020 might be. Seven months since October 31st have been used with
very little substantive progress publicly declared on this particular
matter, which is why I write to you to enquire if there is further news that
has not yet been publicised. There is now only seven months to go.
When I was engaged in resolving
project/programme management failures-in-progress (and that includes some
Government projects/programmes but others too), I often applied a useful rule
of thumb – “The past is not a perfect predictor of the future, but it is
sometimes the best we have”. If very little progress has been made in the
last 7 months, that does not augur well for the next 7 months, and one reason
is that in each case progress depends on realistic plans and effective
relationships with the key stakeholders. Project reports that attributed past
failures to these issues but assumed magical solutions to all problems
invariably proved over-optimistic. Let me apply the above rule of thumb.
. As a rough estimate, I would say that it appears that about 5% of
the necessary work has been done but 50% of the time has been used, and at
that rate of progress it would take another 11 years. I can re-estimate if
there is better information about progress
Perhaps you and your colleagues can
supply positive answers to the above questions. I would be happy to meet to
discuss the matter.
Yours sincerely
Mike
Comments
Post a Comment