Do not be satisfied with a Covid-19 reproduction ratio of 0.9

There has been much attention on seeing the covid-19  reproduction ratio below 1.0, and an assumption in some quarters  that 0.9 is “good”.
In fairness Prof Whitty emphasised that much lower would be better.

It is true that at 0.9 the disease should eventually die out in a given population.

But if the disease follows the mathematics, then an initial 1000 cases will cause, during successive generations of infection, the following numbers of cases:
900, 810, 729, 656, 590 etc …. approaching another nine thousand cases  in total
The expected further cases for various values of R,, the reproduction ratio on the same basis, are as follows
R

Expected further cases
0.9

9000
0.8
4000
0.7
2333
0.6
1500
0.5
1000
0.4
667
0.3
429
0.2
250

The dramatic difference in further cases between 0.9 and 0.8 demonstrates the value of effective measures to avoid the spread of the virus..
While it is difficult to assess R exactly, do not let us be satisfied with 0.9.

____________________________________________

Mathematical note: Total number of further cases =  1000  * R /  (1- R)
This follows from : R + R**2 + R **3 + R** 4 +… (etc)    = R / (1 – R)  for R <1

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Meaty First Caller - "Indian variant" B1617 - transcript of Mike Cashman on BBC Radio 4 Any Answers 15 May 2021

  Anita   Anand ( 00:00 ): Let’s start with the news of the Indian variant, the announcement that we've got to go carefully at five o'clock yesterday, Michael Cashman. You're our first caller on this. What did you make of it all? Mike Cashman   ( 00:11 ): Hallo there Anita, I wish that people who spoke about this on the radio understood the maths. We've had both the prime minister and Niall Ferguson saying it's relatively small numbers - and the Prime Minister actually saying, if we saw exponential growth, then we would have to do something about it. We are seeing exponential growth, now. It's tripling each week is what we've seen, Now the government is wrong to block surge vaccination in Blackburn, Bolton, and so on, because that could have a real impact. And you know, I've heard people say, “Oh well, but the vaccine takes three weeks to take effect”; Anita I'll give you a statistic. If it's tripling every week, then in five weeks, it mult
Read more

9 reasons why I as a Christian, am in favour of remaining in the EU, and opposing the current Brexit path

9 reasons why I as a Christian, am in favour of remaining in the EU, and opposing the current Brexit path (4000 words) INTRODUCTION There are a number of reasons why my Christian Faith leads me to support remaining in the European Union. Of course it’s right to respect that other Christians support Leave, and I have sought to understand their views. It’s reasonable to say that membership of the EU or not is a means to various ends, and people may disagree as to how remaining or leaving would fulfil those ends. This is a practical question; Leave or Remain is not an issue where one answer or the other is intrinsically moral or immoral. I have searched online and have not found much written that covers my nine main reasons, listed below – hence this article. I would be interested in responses, particularly from Christians who support Leave. This is a personal view. But it represents a strong conviction. I  am not denying that others may have different opinions, but I do have
Read more

Covid situation in India tragically illustrates the impact of "taking it on the chin"

  The Covid situation is India is a humanitarian tragedy, I hope the UK  can help further. The DEC Coronavirus appeal has been extended to cover India The situation is also, if we needed one, an illustration of what could have been the impact in the UK  of “letting the virus move through the population” , “taking it on the chin”,  and of not locking down while other countries do so, to avoid (in the words of Johnson’s Greenwich speech), going “beyond what is medically rational to the point of doing real and unnecessary economic damage”. There is debate as to whether Johnson shouted “let the bodies pile high in their thousands”  and thereby demonstrated a lack of empathy with the bereaved and a lack of caring as to how many would die. But after three fatal decisions to delay lockdowns, and after his refusal to meet families of the bereaved, there can be little doubt about the lack of empathy, or of his continued  inclination towards an approach that would have led to a disaster whic
Read more