Traffic lights and unicorns


Once upon a time some people started to make a fuss about traffic lights. Plenty of people thought traffic lights were ok and actually helped people to get around smoothly and safely. But there were some who said “We never voted for traffic lights. Plus, when they first came in, it was just red, amber, green; now we have green right filters, green left filters, pedestrian crossings, timers, buttons for pedestrians to push - it’s never-ending. We even hear that there’s going to be a traffic-light army”.

"We don't want to controlled by unelected red lights"

Those who wanted to Remain with traffic lights felt that they could make gradual improvements to traffic light systems where necessary, but that there was no need to scrap them all. But their opponents told people that the traffic had flowed much better before there had been so many traffic lights. They also said we could save a lot of money if we didn’t need the electricity for the lights, and lies about how much electricity would be saved. “Take Back Control” they urged, and many people agreed that traffic was a problem and it would be better if something was done.

So a vote was held. The government promised that if the people wanted something else instead of traffic lights then that would be done.
The vote was 34% for traffic lights, 37% for no traffic lights, 29% didn’t care. So the government said it would implement “No traffic lights”. That’s when the problems arose, because there was no agreement as to what would be provided instead. Some people thought roundabouts or  mini-roundabouts could be used instead because this was a proven system, but some in the government thought we should do nothing at the junctions and just see what happened. They had plenty of funding from car crash repair firms, and their motivation was questioned by some.

The government said they would provide plenty of unicorns so that people could fly over the junctions, riding their unicorns. They could provide these as easily as popping a ready-meal into a microwave.



But there was considerable doubt as to whether the unicorns could be provided in time, or at all. The Government said there could be no going back to traffic lights, and all the traffic lights would be taken out of service simultaneously on 31st December 2020.

The unicorns that were initially supplied were somewhat disappointing.

We realised that you can vote for unicorns, flyovers, constant full-moons, sunny skies for all Test matches, or whatever you like, and possibly win the vote if what you are offering is popular. You can rejoice over winning the vote and invite all those who voted against to join you. But it doesn’t make a flying flamingo’s difference if you are lying about how difficult your scheme will be, if you have no implementation plan, and no assessment of the impact.

We asked what we could do if we encountered a gridlocked junction in 2021. They replied helpfully “You lost. Get over it”.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Johnson departure - why, when, how, who & what next ?

Image
  JOHNSON DEPARTURE - why, when, how, who & what next? (1000 words) I have blogged bits of this in various places, so this blog post brings them together. WHY? Boris Johnson is arguably the worst leader we could have at this time. Thousands of people have died unnecessarily because of his mistakes; thousands more will die. We also cannot start to fix the Brexit blunders while the Blunderer-in-Chief is in charge. He persistently resists scrutiny and will learn nothing. #IDontBegPardon , we hear from him, which is why that's the title for our new book & CD. A change of Prime Minister, has the potential to save thousands of lives, and that on its own is a good reason to hope for this and to work towards it. We could get a new Prime Minister who is focused on the real job, not on enriching incompetent cronies in the way that the National Audit Office report shows that Johnson's Government has done. WHY WILL MPs SACK HIM? Most MPs want (1) to retain their seats - that's...
Read more

Meaty First Caller - "Indian variant" B1617 - transcript of Mike Cashman on BBC Radio 4 Any Answers 15 May 2021

  Anita   Anand ( 00:00 ): Let’s start with the news of the Indian variant, the announcement that we've got to go carefully at five o'clock yesterday, Michael Cashman. You're our first caller on this. What did you make of it all? Mike Cashman   ( 00:11 ): Hallo there Anita, I wish that people who spoke about this on the radio understood the maths. We've had both the prime minister and Niall Ferguson saying it's relatively small numbers - and the Prime Minister actually saying, if we saw exponential growth, then we would have to do something about it. We are seeing exponential growth, now. It's tripling each week is what we've seen, Now the government is wrong to block surge vaccination in Blackburn, Bolton, and so on, because that could have a real impact. And you know, I've heard people say, “Oh well, but the vaccine takes three weeks to take effect”; Anita I'll give you a statistic. If it's tripling every week, then in five weeks, it mult...
Read more

Covid situation in India tragically illustrates the impact of "taking it on the chin"

  The Covid situation is India is a humanitarian tragedy, I hope the UK  can help further. The DEC Coronavirus appeal has been extended to cover India The situation is also, if we needed one, an illustration of what could have been the impact in the UK  of “letting the virus move through the population” , “taking it on the chin”,  and of not locking down while other countries do so, to avoid (in the words of Johnson’s Greenwich speech), going “beyond what is medically rational to the point of doing real and unnecessary economic damage”. There is debate as to whether Johnson shouted “let the bodies pile high in their thousands”  and thereby demonstrated a lack of empathy with the bereaved and a lack of caring as to how many would die. But after three fatal decisions to delay lockdowns, and after his refusal to meet families of the bereaved, there can be little doubt about the lack of empathy, or of his continued  inclination towards an approach that woul...
Read more